>А чего там переводчик лезет со своими комментариями?
а Вы чего?
И без него понятно. >Война - продолжение политики другими стредствами. >Классиков нужно знать!
сколько мудрости
>Кстати, по рупору китайской компартии можно судить о самой политике Китая. >В целом Китай как будто положительно оценивает рост российской мощи как противовес американским амбициям, поскольку сам в этом заинтересован, в концепции многополярности.
да-да-да. Циньхуа - это тот самый головной мозговой танк по КМГ. А вот симметричный ответ из индусского мозгового танка от тамошнего отставного глав.разведчика
индусский анализ ------------------------- Implications of China's Rise: An Indian Perspective Brig Arun Sahgal
The continued growth of China's overall national power, including its military capabilities, and the manner in which strong resurgent China will employ this power will have far-reaching consequences both for Asia and the world. The Chinese leadership's commitment to build comprehensive national strength and leveraging its strategic configuration of power to achieve its strategic interests remain a major factor in shaping the future stability and security of Asia.
...
There should be no doubt that the underlying aim of the current Chinese leadership is to make China a great power-"world class, second to none"-and that to achieve this goal, the Chinese are consciously and unwaveringly erecting the building blocks of comprehensive national power. Chinese leaders understand that the hard power (e.g., military and economic power) the country has been accumulating over the past 15 years can easily be translated into soft power that enables it to dissuade and deter other states' behavior.
China's growth and activities in Asia underscore the importance and urgency for India's economic success and emergence as a major regional player. Underlying the central importance of successful economic reforms and growth, particularly if India seeks to play a balancing role in Asia, and wants to be accepted as the preferable strategic partner, and above all taken seriously. In fact policymakers/academics from Asian states, particularly from Southeast Asia, and to a degree Japan and Taiwan would like to see India accelerating economic reforms and improve economic infrastructure in order to provide alternative choices. It is important for India to maximize the "arc of advantage" by strengthening relationships with key countries in Asia-Japan, Israel, Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, and Iran-as well as Australia. The underlying theme of Indian Prime Ministers initiative for strategic understanding with the US despite major criticism is underscored by above realisation.
Chinese Balance of Power Strategy in Asia
This is predicated on the fact that China seeks to lead a "unipolar Asia" and is using the concept of "multipolarity" as a smokescreen to facilitate its dominance in Asia. To achieve this broad geo strategic objective that is in tune with the propensities of Middle Kingdom, it is attempting a twin track strategy. One it is incrementally maximizing the power gap between strong Asian neighbours - Japan, India, and Russia. As also by pitting Pakistan against India, North Korea against Japan and South vs North Korea it is attempting to keep its potential Asian rivals preoccupied. In addition, China is using states such as Iran, Myanmar, and Bangladesh etc. as pawns in its balance of power strategy. Secondly it is using soft power in terms of political and economic engagement to incrementally enhance its strategic space in Asia. Its eventual aim is to contain the influence of beleaguered United States to become a pre-eminent power in Asia particularly in terms of economic and strategic dominance. This scenario however is predicated in Chinese perspective upon the medium and long term implications of 'India's rise' and the manner in which resurgent India will attempt to shape its strategic space. That this scenario is worrisome to the Chinese is indicated by frequent assertion by Chinese scholars that whereas China and India could coexist in Asia, their being partners was implausible. Fundamentally Chinese believe that as both countries rise simultaneously competition between the two is inherent. It is the nature of competition that is often left undefined.
China's Economic Orbit .... From Indian perspective despite the enthusiasm about Sino-Indian economic relations and growing political and strategic understanding, there are a range of unsettling developments and concerns about China's role and intentions in Asia that will have a direct impact on India. These developments need to be monitored carefully and India needs to be prepared to counter Chinese inroads with its own strategy. Unfortunately in most areas of present and future competition India lacks a coherent and effective counter-strategy. Be that as it may what is disconcerting is that inconvenient and searching issues are deliberately left off the table at high-level Sino-Indian discussions merely for the sake of moving the relationship forward.